M-theory

I was watching PBS about String Theory, www.superstringtheory.com or M-theory as it is now known. One thing that confuses me is that scientists are still talking about the big bang as if it really happened, and not only that as if it is the only way the universe could have been created. The really odd thing about M-theory is that they postulate that the big bang happened when two parrellel universes collided causing the needed force to scatter into existence the millions of particles. The question that scientist still have not answered is where did all the matter come from? And now the questions are, how did the parallel universes come into existence? Don't get me wrong, I am neither confirming nor denying the existence of strings. But I am denying the process of macro-evolution as creating our universe. God created it. Is it so much easier to believe that a parallel universe collided into our universe and caused the big bang and that for the past 4+ billion years we have slowly evolved from a one celled being into the intelligent life that we are now than to say, God said it and it is? In either situation you are left with one option, either matter has always existed into eternity past and is the uncaused cause, or God has always existed into the past and is the uncaused cause. The problem with matter being the uncaused cause is that matter does not have intelligence and therefore could not produce intelligence, the problem with God being the uncaused cause is that if God created us than we must answer to Him when we die.